| 
                         Posting
                           a link to Find Law.. just went there today and realized the News is coming off the Court Docket we can appreciate that.. now
                           can't we.. JK  http://news.lp.findlaw.com/, Found a story on Nader vs Dems.. on birth certificate .. now isn't that special!  http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/dc/087074p.pdf, in fact this is the best find in a long time.. has it all .. no need to find anything else..  posting june 15 2009
 , http://blogs.findlaw.com/in_house/2009/06/sotomayors-top-five-rulings-on-experts.html#more
 posting June
                           2 2009  article taken from FreeRepublic.. Just a “Poor Choice” of Words ? ....(Sotomayor's words riddled with racism
                              and bigotry)CFP ^ | Saturday, May 30, 2009 | John Lillpop
 
 Posted on Monday, June 01, 2009
                           9:33:06 AM by IrishMike According to President Obama, Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor is guilty of nothing more serious than
                           a “poor choice of words” when she said:  "I would hope that a wise Latina
                           woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t
                           lived that life.”  As reported at the Washington Times, in part, the White House attempted
                           to dismiss Sotomayer’s racist rhetoric:  “The White House said Friday that Supreme
                           Court nominee Judge Sonia Sotomayor now regrets saying in 2001 that a Hispanic woman would tend to arrive at a ‘better
                           conclusion’ in making legal decisions than a white male.  “Her word choice in
                           2001 was poor,” spokesman Robert Gibbs said, seeking to settle what has become an early stumbling point for President
                           Obama’s nominee as she prepares for her Senate confirmation battle.”  Excuse me?
                           We are talking about a nominee whom the president described as “brilliant” and yet she is not sufficiently bright
                           to avoid words riddled with the passions of racism and bigotry?  Either Sotomayor is far less
                           than “brilliant” than Obama knows, or she is an unrepentant racist.  Regardless
                           of which happens to be true, this unwise Latina simply does not belong on the Supreme Court.  Surely,
                           that cannot be all that difficult to understand?  Example, what if the record of Chief Justice
                           John Roberts revealed a similarly poor choice of words? What if Roberts was on videotape saying:  “"Because
                           of educational and cultural advantages, I would hope that a wise white male with the richness of his education and experiences
                           would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a female person of color who hasn’t lived that life.”
                            Would John Roberts have been confirmed to the Supreme Court with that quote in his dossier?
 (Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ... OBAMA SELECTS SOTOMAYOR.. CHECK THIS OUT!   | URGENT NEW PETITION:  Click,
                           sign, WE WILL FAX your petition automatically to all 99 Senators, to OPPOSE and FILIBUSTER Judge Sotomayor. (Saving
                           hours of labor!)
 TOP TEN REASONS SOTOMAYOR WON'T BE CONFIRMED (& how to stop her)
 
 I generally support the idea of
                           nominating a woman or a Hispanic to the U.S. Supreme Court, but not this one, not Judge Sonia Sotomayor. And she's so biased,
                           that I'll go out on a limb to predict she won't be confirmed, for ten reasons:
 
 10) SOTOMAYOR: ADMITS MAKING ACTIVIST
                           POLICY FROM THE BENCH
 
 In a 2005 panel discussion at Duke University, Sotomayor told students that the federal Court of Appeals
                           is where "policy is made." She said the "Court of Appeals is where policy is made. And I know, and I know,
                           that this is on tape, and I should never say that. Because we don't 'make law,' I know. [audience laughter] Okay, I know.
                           I know. I'm not promoting it, and I'm not advocating it. I'm, you know. [audience laughter] Having said that, the Court of
                           Appeals is where, before the Supreme Court makes the final decision, the law is percolating. Its interpretation, its
                           application."  As a judicial activist, she jokingly admits "making policy" from the bench, based on feelings
                           or empathy or judicial precedent, not laws passed by Congress, and so she assumes the power of legislature, to make policy,
                           legislating from the bench.
 
 9) SOTOMAYOR: PRO-ABORTION-SUPPORTS ROE V. WADE
 
 Although she ruled to uphold the
                           longstanding "Mexico City Policy" which had limited funds for abortions performed overseas (until President Obama
                           struck down that policy, now fully funding abortions overseas with our taxes), Sotomayor stands squarely in the camp
                           of supporting and upholding the Roe v. Wade decision that legalized child killing across America and cost 50,000,000 children
                           their lives.
 
 Furthermore, Rev. Rob Schenck of The National Clergy Council now reports that Sotomayor was
                           or is an active board member of a group called the "Childbirth Connection" that advocates for "reproductive
                           rights of women," which is generally a code word for abortion on demand, including partial birth abortion, which Sotomayor
                           has never publicly opposed.  Since I was born to a single mom who courageously gave me up for adoption, and I was
                           adopted at age three by a Christian family, I'm passionately pro-life.
 
 PLEASE SELECT HERE TO SIGN, AND WE'LL AUTOMATICALLY FAX YOUR PERSONALIZED PETITION TO ALL 99 SENATORS, TO OPPOSE AND FILIBUSTER
                              JUDGE SONIA SOTOMAYOR.  (SAVING YOU HOURS OF LABOR!)
 
   8)
                           SOTOMAYOR: ANTI-GUN, ANTI-WEAPON, ANTI- 2nd AMENDMENT
 
 In her ruling to allow government to ban privately owned weapons belonging to New
                           York citizens, Sonia Sotomayor wrote in Maloney v. Cuomo: "The Second Amendment applies only to limitations the federal
                           government seeks to impose on this right . . . not upon that of the state." Since her crazy reading of the 2nd Amendment
                           only forbids Congress from seizing your guns, the New York State Assembly was fully authorized to ban nunchuks, or seize
                           ANY AND ALL of your weapons, according to Sotomayor's anti-liberty reasoning.  But as a former military distinguished
                           marksman and former captain of my rifle team at a New York State high school, I care about protecting our right to bear arms.
 
 7) SOTOMAYOR: ANTI-TEN
                           COMMANDMENTS, BUT PRO-MUSLIM?
 
 ACLJ Attorney Jay Sekulow said of Sotomayor: "She is left in judicial philosophy, ranges much further left than
                           Justice Ginsburg or Justice Souter . . . I just had a case where the Court was unanimous, it was involving the 10 commandments
                           issue, and the court was unanimous 9 to 0, but I would not expect that if Judge Sotomayor was confirmed, that it would
                           probably have been 8 to 1.  She has a very, very strict view of church-state separation, and she was aggressive on this
                           idea of a 'living constitution.'"  Meanwhile she ruled one Muslim prisoner had a right to receive the Eid ul
                           Fitr feast (a Muslim holiday meal) in his prison cell, and another Muslim prisoner had a right to access a Muslim chaplain,
                           which is fine if she treats other faiths equally.  But I personally suspect Sotomayor would rule to disallow public prayers offered "in Jesus name" but allow prayers
                           to Allah, just like Obama's other judicial nominee David Hamilton.
 
 PLEASE SELECT HERE TO SIGN, AND WE'LL AUTOMATICALLY FAX YOUR PERSONALIZED PETITION TO ALL 99 SENATORS, TO OPPOSE AND FILIBUSTER
                              JUDGE SONIA SOTOMAYOR.  (SAVING YOU HOURS OF LABOR!)
 
 6)
                           SOTOMAYOR:  SAVIOR OF THE NATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF WOMEN
 
 NOW President Kim Gandy quickly endorsed Sotomayor, saying: "This morning
                           we will celebrate, and this afternoon NOW will launch our 'Confirm Her' campaign to ensure the swift confirmation of the next
                           Supreme Court Justice."  There's no way this liberal group would endorse Sotomayor unless she were pro-lesbian
                           and pro-abortion, as Gandy openly advocates on the NOW web-site.
 
 5) SOTOMAYOR: OVERRULED 33 OF 44 VOTES BY SUPREME
                           COURT
 
 Sotomayor has
                           had 5 decisions reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court, 3 of which have been reversed.  One of these was her aggressive pro-environmental
                           anti-energy decision, another was her aggressive pro-litigation anti-business decision, which was overturned unanimously. 
                           She has carried only 11 of 44 possible votes during those cases.  Chief Justice Roberts once stated that her method
                           of reading the statute in question "flies in the face of the statutory language." Dean Mat Staver of Liberty
                           Law School cites these reasons to oppose Sotomayor, saying, "No one ever expected President Barack Obama to nominate
                           someone who respects the original intent of the Constitution."
 
 4) SOTOMAYOR: FAVORITISM BY RACE OR GENDER, NOT LAW
 
 Sotomayor told the Berkeley
                           Law School: "Our gender and national origins may and will make a difference in our judging . . .I would hope that a wise
                           Latina woman with the richness of her experience would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who
                           hasn't lived that life."  It is no surprise, therefore, she ruled against white Firefighters of New Haven, throwing
                           out the results of a promotion exam because almost no minorities qualified.  She denied promotion for the white firefighters
                           who performed well on the exam, and gave minorities who failed the exam favorable consideration toward promotion. 
                           Sotomayor promotes aggressive affirmative action, promoting race or gender, not merit.   The U.S. Supreme Court reviewed
                           this case in April 2009, and is expected to overturn her again.
 
 3) SOTOMAYOR: FAVORS INTERNATIONAL LAW OVER AMERICAN LAW
 
 Opposing a U.S. Congressional bill that would forbid
                           activist judges from citing international law (instead of applying American law) in their decisions, Sotomayor wrote the controversial
                           introduction for The International Judge, a book that promotes, in her words, "developing an international
                           rule of law and institution-building" and idealizes the "pioneers who work tirelessly to bring these institutions
                           from their incipience to their maturity."    No doubt she will vote with Justice Ginsberg, who believes American
                           judges should sometimes look toward international law rather than the U.S. Constitution.
 
 PLEASE SELECT HERE TO SIGN, AND WE'LL AUTOMATICALLY FAX YOUR PERSONALIZED PETITION TO ALL 99 SENATORS, TO OPPOSE AND FILIBUSTER
                              JUDGE SONIA SOTOMAYOR.  (SAVING YOU HOURS OF LABOR!)
 
 2) SOTOMAYOR:  EVEN THE LIBERALS CALL HER A BULLY
 
 Her own former clerk, liberal Jeffrey Rosen, now legal affairs editor for The New
                           Republic, said she has "has an inflated opinion of herself" and is "kind of a bully on the bench." Another
                           clerk who worked on the 2nd Circuit said she's: "not that smart and kind of a bully on the bench . . .She has an inflated
                           opinion of herself, and is domineering during oral arguments, but her questions aren't penetrating and don't get to the heart
                           of the issue."
 
 1)
                           SOTOMAYOR: BASEBALL BIAS FOR NEW YORK YANKEES!
 
 As a native of South Bronx, Sotomayor's hidden home-town bias became manifest in her love for the New York
                           Yankees, judicially favoring her "Bronx Bombers" over teams from all other cities.  No kidding!  When
                           ruling to end the 1995 baseball strike, she sided with the player's union against team owners (who sought parity among all
                           teams with an talent-sharing salary cap).  Instead Sotomayor created bias in favor of rich teams who can afford to buy
                           up all the good free agents.  So when the New York Yankees hogged 4 titles and 6 pennants in the 8 years after her ruling,
                           with payrolls averaging three times most other team salaries, you can blame Sotomayor for creating that competitive imbalance. 
                           I understand why Yankees fans might celebrate her promotion to the Supreme Court, but baseball fans from all other cities
                           should complain loudly against her confirmation!
 
 WHY DID SEVEN REPUBLICANS VOTE FOR HER?
 
 In 1991, President George H.W. Bush was forced to pick Sotomayor,
                           in a back-room deal manipulated by powerful New York Senator Patrick Moynihan, but Bush Sr. likely regrets this
                           just like he later regretted nominating Justice Souter.  In 1998, Sotomayor was barely confirmed to the 2nd Circuit
                           Court under Bill Clinton, but only seven current 2009 Republicans voted for Sotomayor then: Susan Collins (R-Maine), Olympia
                           Snowe (R-Maine) Judd Gregg (R-N.H.), Thad Cochran (R-Miss.), Richard Lugar (R-Ind.), Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), Robert Bennett
                           (R-Utah).  They were misled into joining all Democrats to push Sotomayor through by a vote of 68-28.  Perhaps
                           you might call these 7 Republicans (and all Southern Democrats, and both Penn. Democrats Specter and Casey, and Sen. Ben Nelson,
                           D-Neb.) at 202-225-3121 and ask them to OPPOSE AND FILIBUSTER Judge Sotomayor.
 
 But remember, 100 emails = 10 phone calls = 1 fax in political capital, since the Senate staffers must handle each paper and usually write a reply.
                           So please join our automated fax campaign first!
 
 PLEASE SELECT HERE TO SIGN, AND WE'LL AUTOMATICALLY FAX YOUR PERSONALIZED PETITION TO ALL 99 SENATORS, TO OPPOSE AND FILIBUSTER
                              JUDGE SONIA SOTOMAYOR.  (SAVING YOU HOURS OF LABOR!)
 
 ALL
                           TRUE CONSERVATIVES WILL VOTE AGAINST HER
 
 In 1998, twenty-eight conservative Senators united against Sotomayor, but now we need 40 to uphold a filibuster. 
                           Two leading conservative Senators have already questioned her credentials:  "The role of a jurist in our democracy
                           is to apply the law evenhandedly, despite their own feelings or personal or political preferences," said Senate Republican
                           Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.  "We must determine if Ms. Sotomayor understands that the proper role of a judge
                           is to act as a neutral umpire of the law, calling balls and strikes fairly without regard to one's own personal preferences
                           or political views," said Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., the top Republican on the Judiciary Committee.
 
 Let's support Leader McConnell and Ranking
                           Member Sessions by encouraging them to stand firm, and get more Senators to OPPOSE AND FILIBUSTER Sotomayor's nomination.
 
 |  | | God
                           Bless you, in Jesus' name,
  Chaplain Gordon James Klingenschmitt
 
 To invite "Chaps" to speak to your crowd, select here.
 
 
 | 
 |  | P.S. Time is urgent!  The Obama Administration wants to rush this nomination through the Senate Judiciary
                           Committee quickly.  We can and must act today.  Please don't wait another minute.   Please join our
                           fax campaign right away, and let your voice be heard! 
 Donations supporting religious education can be made here or also mailed to:
 Pray In Jesus Name, PO Box
                           77077, Colorado Springs, CO  80970
 
 Disclaimer: The views of Chaplain Klingenschmitt, who was honorably but involuntarily
                           discharged from the Navy in 2007 after facing court-martial for praying "in Jesus name" in uniform, (but was
                           later vindicated by Congress), are his own personal views, and are not endorsed by any party or government or organization
 | 
 |