Two public discussions regarding
Barack Obama’s Presidential eligibility will take place this Monday, December 8, 2008. I will
be co-hosting a conference call at 9:00 a.m. PDT/12:00 Noon EDT. To listen and participate, please call 1-712-775-7100
and enter access code 594092#. Then, at 1:30 p.m. EDT/10:30 PDT, the We The People Foundation
press conference will be aired from the National Press Club in Washington D.C. - . Please note that both the conference call forum and the
National Press Club conference will be broadcast worldwide on CrusadeRadio. We, the citizenry of America, have the basic right to learn about
this critical information. I urge you to report in detail about both events! Pastor Wiley Drake Email: wileydrake@hotmail.com 714-865-8132 ______________________________________________________________________
Will Supremes review citizenship arguments? Lawsuit: Even with a valid birth certificate, 'he still wouldn't
be eligible to be president'
Posted: December 05, 2008 10:00 pm Eastern
© 2008 WorldNetDaily
 Roger Bredow and demonstrators protesting before the U.S. Supreme
Court | With protesters
gathering and praying on the front steps, the U.S. Supreme Court met in conference today to discuss whether or not to hear
a case challenging Barack Obama's eligibility to be president.
"Obama was born a dual citizen," protester Roger Bredow told the Washington, D.C., local events blog, DCist . "British, and a citizen of the United States, at birth."
According to Bredow – and the case the Supreme Court reviewed today – dual citizenship makes Obama ineligible to take the oath of office. Where's the proof Barack Obama was born in the U.S. or that he fulfills the "natural-born American" clause in
the Constitution? If you still want to see it, sign WND's petition demanding the release of his birth certificate. The case of Leo C. Donofrio v. New Jersey Secretary
of State Nina Mitchell Wells, which claims Obama does not meet the Constitution's Article 2, Section 1 "natural-born
citizen" requirement for president, was initially denied a hearing by Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter, but Justice
Clarence Thomas agreed to bring it back for review today. In order to go forward in the process, the case needs four
of the Supreme Court's nine justices to approve a full hearing. (Story continues below) Bredow created a YouTube video inviting supporters to travel to Washington, D.C., and join him in
urging the Supreme Court to hear the Donofrio case. "If I'm going to be honest with you," Bredow confessed,
"I thought I might be the only person here." DCist contributor Dave Weigel reported roughly 15 to 20 people
showed up for the rally. "There aren't a lot of people out here today," said Steve Brindle, who drove
into the capital from Pennsylvania. "There are a lot of people talking about this back home. Really, everyone's asking
questions." Donofrio's questions began months ago. Donofrio's original suit sought a court order
to stop the Nov. 4 presidential election. When that was denied, he amended his complaint to stop the Electoral
College from certifying Obama as the winning candidate when it meets Dec. 15. Unlike many of the lawsuits regarding
Obama's "natural-born citizen" status, the Donofrio case makes no allegation that Obama was born on foreign
soil. Instead, Donofrio contends Obama was a British citizen at birth, because of citizenship in a British colony, Kenya.
"Don't be distracted by the birth certificate and Indonesia issues," Donofrio writes on his Natural Born Citizen blog. "They are irrelevant to Senator Obama's ineligibility to be president. Since Barack Obama's
father was a citizen of Kenya and therefore subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of Senator Obama's
birth, then Senator Obama was a British citizen 'at birth.'" Obama's Fight the Smears website confirms that Donofrio is correct about the Democrat's citizenship
at birth, but says his dual citizenship with Britain expired, leaving him with only American citizenship. Donfrio, however,
contends that the Constitution was written in such a way to exclude dual citizens like Obama. "The Framers of the
Constitution, at the time of their birth," Donofrio writes, "were also British citizens, and that's why the
Framers declared that, while they were citizens of the United States, they themselves were not 'natural born citizens.'"
"Therefore," Donofrio summarizes, "even if he were to produce an original birth certificate proving he
were born on U.S. soil, he still wouldn't be eligible to be president." As WND has reported, Donofrio's
case is only one of several filed around the country challenging Obama's eligibility to be elected president under
the Constitution. Last month WND reported worries over a "constitutional crisis" that could be looming
over the issue of Obama's citizenship. WND senior reporter Jerome Corsi even traveled to Kenya and Hawaii
prior to the election to investigate issues surrounding Obama's birth. But his research and discoveries only raised more questions. The
biggest question is why Obama, if a Hawaii birth certificate exists as his campaign has stated, simply hasn't ordered
it made available to settle the rumors. The governor's office in Hawaii said there is a valid certificate but rejected
requests for access and left ambiguous its origin: Does the certificate on file with the Department of Health indicate a Hawaii
birth or was it generated after the Obama family registered a Kenyan birth in Hawaii? Obama's half-sister, Maya Soetoro,
has named two different Hawaii hospitals where Obama could have been born. There have been other allegations that Obama actually
was born in Kenya during a time when his father was a British subject. Former presidential candidate Alan Keyes and others filed a court petition in California asking the secretary
of state to refuse to allow the state's 55 Electoral College votes to be cast in the 2008 presidential election until
Obama verifies his eligibility to hold the office. The California action was filed by Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation on behalf of Keyes, the presidential candidate of the American Independent
Party, along with Wiley S. Drake and Markham Robinson, both California electors. "Should Senator Obama be discovered,
after he takes office, to be ineligible for the Office of President of the United States of America and, thereby, his election
declared void, Petitioners, as well as other Americans, will suffer irreparable harm in that (a) usurper will be sitting as
the President of the United States, and none of the treaties, laws, or executive orders signed by him will be valid or legal,"
the action challenges. The popular vote Nov. 4 favored Obama over Sen. John McCain by several percentage points. But
because of the distribution of the votes, Obama is projected to take the Electoral College vote by a 2-to-1 margin. The
California case states, "There is a reasonable and common expectation by the voters that to qualify for the ballot, the
individuals running for office must meet minimum qualifications as outlined in the federal and state
Constitutions and statutes, and that compliance with those minimum qualifications has been confirmed by the officials overseeing
the election process," the complaint said, when in fact the only documentation currently required is a signed statement
from the candidate attesting to those qualifications. "Since has, as its core, the mission of certifying and establishing
the validity of the election process, this writ seeks a Court Order barring SOS from certifying the California Electors until
documentary proof that Senator Obama is a 'natural born' citizen of the United States of America is received by her,"
the document said. "This proof could include items such as his original birth certificate, showing the name of the
hospital and the name and the signature of the doctor, all of his passports with immigration stamps, and verification from the governments where the candidate
has resided, verifying that he did not, and does not, hold citizenship of these countries, and any other documents
that certify an individual’s citizenship and/or qualification for office. The "certification of live birth"
posted by the Obama campaign cannot be viewed as authoritative, the case alleges. "Hawaii Revised Statute 338-178
allows registration of birth in Hawaii for a child that was born outside of Hawaii to parents who, for a year preceding the
child’s birth, claimed Hawaii as their place of residence," the document said. "The only way to know where
Senator Obama was actually born is to view Senator Obama's original birth certificate from 1961 that shows the name of
the hospital and the name and signature of the doctor that delivered him." The case also raises the circumstances
of Obama's time during his youth in Indonesia, where he was listed as having Indonesian citizenship. Indonesia does not
allow dual citizenship, raising the possibility of Obama's mother having given up his U.S. citizenship. Any subsequent
U.S. citizenship then, the case claims, would be "naturalized," not "natural-bornObama's eligibility to be president.
"Obama was born
a dual citizen," protester Roger Bredow told the Washington, D.C., local events blog, DCist. "British, and a citizen of the United States, at birth."
According to Bredow – and the case the Supreme Court reviewed today – dual citizenship makes Obama ineligible to take the oath of office. Where's the proof Barack Obama was born in the U.S. or that he fulfills the "natural-born American" clause in
the Constitution? If you still want to see it, sign WND's petition demanding the release of his birth certificate. The case of Leo C. Donofrio v. New Jersey Secretary
of State Nina Mitchell Wells, which claims Obama does not meet the Constitution's Article 2, Section 1 "natural-born
citizen" requirement for president, was initially denied a hearing by Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter, but Justice
Clarence Thomas agreed to bring it back for review today. In order to go forward in the process, the case needs four
of the Supreme Court's nine justices to approve a full hearing. (Story continues below) Bredow created a YouTube video inviting supporters to travel to Washington, D.C., and join him in
urging the Supreme Court to hear the Donofrio case. "If I'm going to be honest with you," Bredow confessed,
"I thought I might be the only person here." DCist contributor Dave Weigel reported roughly 15 to 20 people
showed up for the rally. "There aren't a lot of people out here today," said Steve Brindle, who drove
into the capital from Pennsylvania. "There are a lot of people talking about this back home. Really, everyone's asking
questions." Donofrio's questions began months ago. Donofrio's original suit sought a court order
to stop the Nov. 4 presidential election. When that was denied, he amended his complaint to stop the Electoral
College from certifying Obama as the winning candidate when it meets Dec. 15. Unlike many of the lawsuits regarding
Obama's "natural-born citizen" status, the Donofrio case makes no allegation that Obama was born on foreign
soil. Instead, Donofrio contends Obama was a British citizen at birth, because of citizenship in a British colony, Kenya.
"Don't be distracted by the birth certificate and Indonesia issues," Donofrio writes on his Natural Born Citizen blog. "They are irrelevant to Senator Obama's ineligibility to be president. Since Barack Obama's
father was a citizen of Kenya and therefore subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of Senator Obama's
birth, then Senator Obama was a British citizen 'at birth.'" Obama's Fight the Smears website confirms that Donofrio is correct about the Democrat's citizenship
at birth, but says his dual citizenship with Britain expired, leaving him with only American citizenship. Donfrio, however,
contends that the Constitution was written in such a way to exclude dual citizens like Obama. "The Framers of the
Constitution, at the time of their birth," Donofrio writes, "were also British citizens, and that's why the
Framers declared that, while they were citizens of the United States, they themselves were not 'natural born citizens.'"
"Therefore," Donofrio summarizes, "even if he were to produce an original birth certificate proving he
were born on U.S. soil, he still wouldn't be eligible to be president." As WND has reported, Donofrio's
case is only one of several filed around the country challenging Obama's eligibility to be elected president under
the Constitution. Last month WND reported worries over a "constitutional crisis" that could be looming
over the issue of Obama's citizenship. WND senior reporter Jerome Corsi even traveled to Kenya and Hawaii
prior to the election to investigate issues surrounding Obama's birth. But his research and discoveries only raised more questions. The
biggest question is why Obama, if a Hawaii birth certificate exists as his campaign has stated, simply hasn't ordered
it made available to settle the rumors. The governor's office in Hawaii said there is a valid certificate but rejected
requests for access and left ambiguous its origin: Does the certificate on file with the Department of Health indicate a Hawaii
birth or was it generated after the Obama family registered a Kenyan birth in Hawaii? Obama's half-sister, Maya Soetoro,
has named two different Hawaii hospitals where Obama could have been born. There have been other allegations that Obama actually
was born in Kenya during a time when his father was a British subject. Former presidential candidate Alan Keyes and others filed a court petition in California asking the secretary
of state to refuse to allow the state's 55 Electoral College votes to be cast in the 2008 presidential election until
Obama verifies his eligibility to hold the office. The California action was filed by Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation on behalf of Keyes, the presidential candidate of the American Independent
Party, along with Wiley S. Drake and Markham Robinson, both California electors. "Should Senator Obama be discovered,
after he takes office, to be ineligible for the Office of President of the United States of America and, thereby, his election
declared void, Petitioners, as well as other Americans, will suffer irreparable harm in that (a) usurper will be sitting as
the President of the United States, and none of the treaties, laws, or executive orders signed by him will be valid or legal,"
the action challenges. The popular vote Nov. 4 favored Obama over Sen. John McCain by several percentage points. But
because of the distribution of the votes, Obama is projected to take the Electoral College vote by a 2-to-1 margin. The
California case states, "There is a reasonable and common expectation by the voters that to qualify for the ballot, the
individuals running for office must meet minimum qualifications as outlined in the federal and state
Constitutions and statutes, and that compliance with those minimum qualifications has been confirmed by the officials overseeing
the election process," the complaint said, when in fact the only documentation currently required is a signed statement
from the candidate attesting to those qualifications. "Since has, as its core, the mission of certifying and establishing
the validity of the election process, this writ seeks a Court Order barring SOS from certifying the California Electors until
documentary proof that Senator Obama is a 'natural born' citizen of the United States of America is received by her,"
the document said. "This proof could include items such as his original birth certificate, showing the name of the
hospital and the name and the signature of the doctor, all of his passports with immigration stamps, and verification from the governments where the candidate
has resided, verifying that he did not, and does not, hold citizenship of these countries, and any other documents
that certify an individual’s citizenship and/or qualification for office. The "certification of live birth"
posted by the Obama campaign cannot be viewed as authoritative, the case alleges. "Hawaii Revised Statute 338-178
allows registration of birth in Hawaii for a child that was born outside of Hawaii to parents who, for a year preceding the
child’s birth, claimed Hawaii as their place of residence," the document said. "The only way to know where
Senator Obama was actually born is to view Senator Obama's original birth certificate from 1961 that shows the name of
the hospital and the name and signature of the doctor that delivered him." The case also raises the circumstances
of Obama's time during his youth in Indonesia, where he was listed as having Indonesian citizenship. Indonesia does not
allow dual citizenship, raising the possibility of Obama's mother having given up his U.S. citizenship. Any subsequent
U.S. citizenship then, the case claims, would be "naturalized," not "natural-born
|